Last Updated: December 2025
Introduction
This policy defines the standards and procedures for article review on the Qalenor platform, with special focus on the Qalenor Review medical article review system.
Through this policy, we aim to:
- Ensure quality and accuracy of published content
- Provide clear standards for reviewers
- Protect readers from inaccurate information
- Build trust in approved content
1. Review Objectives
1.1 Primary Objectives
- Accuracy: Verify the correctness of presented information
- Reliability: Ensure content is based on trustworthy sources
- Clarity: Confirm content is easily understood by readers
- Safety: Protect readers from harmful information
1.2 Scope of Review
Review includes:
- Medical and health articles
- Scientific and technical content
- Educational and instructional articles
2. Types of Reviewers
2.1 Medical Reviewer
Required Qualifications:
- Accredited medical degree (physician, pharmacist, specialist)
- Minimum 3 years professional experience
- Specialization in the reviewed field
Permissions:
- Review medical articles
- Approve or reject articles
- Provide corrective feedback
- Add explanatory comments
2.2 Auditor
Required Qualifications:
- Quality assurance experience
- Knowledge of content standards
Permissions:
- Review medical reviewers' work
- Verify procedures are followed
- Audit review quality
2.3 System Administrator (Admin)
Full Permissions:
- Manage reviewer accounts
- Supervise review process
- Revoke approvals when necessary
- Export data and reports
3. Evaluation Criteria
3.1 Star Rating System
| Rating | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
| ★★★★★ (5) | Excellent - Article is accurate and comprehensive | Approved |
| ★★★★☆ (4) | Good - Needs minor improvements | Review |
| ★★★☆☆ (3) | Acceptable - Needs additional review | Review |
| ★★☆☆☆ (2) | Weak - Fundamental issues | Rewrite |
| ★☆☆☆☆ (1) | Rejected - Inaccurate or harmful information | Rejected |
3.2 Detailed Evaluation Criteria
Scientific Accuracy (40%)
- Correctness of medical/scientific information
- Content based on documented research and studies
- Information updated according to latest references
Comprehensiveness (20%)
- Coverage of all topic aspects
- Addressing common questions
- Providing sufficient information to readers
Clarity and Style (20%)
- Easy understanding for general readers
- Logical organization of information
- Use of clear and appropriate language
Safety (20%)
- Absence of harmful information
- Appropriate warnings where needed
- Disclaimers when necessary
4. Review Procedures
4.1 Article Receipt
- Notify reviewer of new article
- Assign article to appropriate reviewer
- Set review deadline
4.2 Review Process
- Initial Reading: Understand general content
- Verification: Review information accuracy
- Evaluation: Apply evaluation criteria
- Commentary: Write notes and recommendations
- Decision: Approve, reject, or request modification
4.3 Post-Review
- Notify writer of review result
- Provide detailed feedback
- Follow up on required modifications
5. Code of Conduct for Reviewers
5.1 Integrity
- Provide objective and fair reviews
- No bias toward any party or opinion
- Disclose conflicts of interest
5.2 Confidentiality
- Maintain confidentiality of unpublished articles
- Do not share content with external parties
- Respect writers' privacy
5.3 Professionalism
- Meet set deadlines
- Provide constructive and useful feedback
- Communicate respectfully with all parties
5.4 Prohibitions
- Accepting bribes or gifts for positive reviews
- Plagiarism or intellectual theft
- Abusing writers or users
- Intentionally publishing misleading information
6. Approval and Revocation
6.1 Granting Approval
Approval is granted when:
- Article receives 5-star rating
- Passes evaluation criteria
- No fundamental issues exist
6.2 Types of Approval
- Medical Approval: From medical reviewer
- Audit Approval: From auditor (optional)
- Full Approval: Medical + Audit
6.3 Approval Revocation
Approval is revoked in the following cases:
- Discovery of inaccurate information
- Change in medical guidelines
- Documented complaints from specialists
- Writer's request
Revocation Procedures:
- Document reason for revocation
- Notify relevant parties
- Remove approval badge
- Allow opportunity for appeal
7. Appeals
7.1 Right to Appeal
- Writers have the right to appeal rejection decisions
- Reviewers have the right to object to administrative decisions
7.2 Appeal Procedures
- Submit appeal request within 14 days
- Explain reasons for objection
- Request reviewed by independent committee
- Final decision issued within 30 days
7.3 Independent Committee
- Composed of reviewers not involved in original decision
- Decisions are final and binding
8. Quality Assurance
8.1 Periodic Review
- Monthly review of review samples
- Evaluation of reviewer performance
- Update standards as needed
8.2 Feedback
- Writer satisfaction surveys
- Review of complaints and suggestions
- Continuous process improvement
8.3 Training
- Training for new reviewers
- Professional development workshops
- Updates on standards and procedures
9. Responsibility and Accountability
9.1 Reviewer Responsibility
- Reviewers are responsible for quality of their reviews
- Account may be suspended or terminated for standard violations
- Record of all reviews is maintained
9.2 Platform Responsibility
- Provide necessary tools and resources
- Ensure fair review process
- Protect rights of all parties
9.3 Limitations of Liability
- Reviews reflect reviewers' opinions
- Not considered personal medical advice
- Health decisions should be made with a specialist
10. Reports and Statistics
10.1 Reviewer Reports
- Number of completed reviews
- Average review time
- Rating distribution
10.2 Quality Reports
- Approval and rejection rates
- Complaints and appeals
- Writer satisfaction
10.3 Report Access
- Only administrators access full reports
- Reviewers see their personal statistics
11. Updates and Modifications
11.1 Policy Updates
- Policy is reviewed annually
- Updated as needed
- All reviewers notified of changes
11.2 Effective Changes
- Changes take effect 30 days after announcement
- Emergency changes may take effect immediately
12. Contact and Support
For any questions about the review policy:
- Email: reviewers@qalenor.com
- Technical Support: support@qalenor.com
- Website: qalenor.com
13. Acceptance
By accepting the reviewer role, you agree to comply with this policy and all standards and procedures contained herein.
Qalenor - Qalenor Review Medical Article Review System
© 2025 Qalenor. All rights reserved.